Chapter 60 The battle continues. Wild boars can’t eat fine bran? (Please read on)
The next day, the box office battle continued.

After a day and a night of fermentation, "Glorious Times", "Funny Road" and "War" have already generated initial response.

The reputation of "The Glorious Era" is very polarized. People who like it like it very much, while people who don't like it call it a bad movie.

"Funny Road Show" also encountered bad reviews.

In comparison, "War" is the best. At least its story is complete and Cai Wenlan's acting skills are also very good. Even at her age, she still fights very hard in the movie.

However, the subject matter of "War" destined it to be critically acclaimed but not commercially successful. Perhaps, the era of veteran martial arts movie stars is really over.

-

A cinema.

"The Glorious Era" has just ended.

Two audience members were talking in the crowd.

“What did you think of this movie?”

"To be honest, I don't quite understand it. I'm totally confused. I don't know how he developed a company and became the chairman of the Chamber of Commerce. I know he wanted to make me happy when he filmed that scene, but I just can't feel happy."

"Are you trying to describe the feeling of scratching an itch?"

"Yes, it's just scratching the surface. I just can't relate to the character. He's just pretending to be cool. And the second half is very cliché. It's a business war movie, a gangster movie, and then a police and gangster movie."

"It's similar to my feeling. To be honest, I felt it was over when I was halfway through watching it. I originally came to watch this movie for Lu Zhuofeng, but I didn't expect it to be so bad."

"be cheated."

There are several main points that netizens criticized about "The Glorious Era".

1. Its plot is too full, because it tells stories about things in the 1980s, 1990s, and there are too many business war scenes. The huge amount of information will be very difficult for people who don’t know the background. The result of being too full is that it wants to say everything, but nothing is said clearly.

2. The rhythm of the movie is quite problematic. The story is a very good one, and the character's prototype's rise to fame is very inspiring, but Lu Zhuofeng cut a very good story into pieces.

The result is that the protagonist's fortune is sporadic, and the suppression from the enemy and the business war are also anticlimactic.

Moreover, Lu Zhuofeng showed off his skills crazily in this movie, and various timelines intersected, leaving many viewers confused and not even knowing which came first and which came later.

The result is that there are some exciting moments, but it seems like there aren't any; there are also some serious moments, but it seems like this movie itself shouldn't be serious.

3. Because the plot is very scattered, the characters are very thin. Lu Zhuofeng can only add emotions and family affection to try to enrich the characters, but the problem is that these added contents make the content more scattered. If you look closely, you will find that the rhythm of the emotional drama and the main plot is different. Once it comes to the emotional drama, the amount of information drops sharply.

Moreover, the information given in many places in the middle, when you think it is a foreshadowing, turns out to be of no use later.

Of course, there are also wonderful aspects of this movie.

First of all, it is the charm of the male protagonist's character, or the charm of the leading actor, which runs through the main line.

The second is the lens language, scenery and film texture.

Because Lu Zhuofeng came from the 1980s, 1990s and 2000s, film production with the 1980s, 1990s and 2000s as the story background is not only his comfort zone, but also his dominant zone!

Through his lens, he vividly portrayed the collective upward social atmosphere of Tianxia in the 1980s, 1990s and 2000s, and restored the true style of that era, which many fans called it real.

But these things are only secondary. No matter how good the camera language is or how realistic the scenery is, the information conveyed is invalid. They are just good-looking, and it’s all in vain if the movie is not exciting!
The same thing goes for acting! Acting serves the plot, not the other way around.

-

In a post on Douban, a film critic stood up for Lu Zhuofeng.

"Is "The Glorious Era" criticized? The coldest joke of 2021! "

"Let me tell you four New Year jokes. It's been a month since the release of "A Flowing Water", but Douban still doesn't dare to give a score. The watered-down version of "Jack the Law Enforcer" has a high score of 7.7 on Douban. Master Gong's historical masterpiece "We Are the One" which took three years to create has a bad reputation and was rated as a fake and exaggerated bad drama. The best movie of the year, "Glorious Times", was given one star by the audience!"

"If I were to describe this chaos in the film and television industry in one sentence, it would be the degradation of the creative environment and the audience's aesthetic taste!"

"In this era of aesthetic degradation and entertainment to death, "We Are on the Front Line" created by Master Gong and "Glorious Era" directed by Lv Zhuofeng are undoubtedly a dimensionality reduction attack on the chaos in the market industry."

"So the controversy between We Are on the Front Line and The Glorious Era is not difficult to understand, because wild boars cannot eat fine bran, their aesthetic tastes have been downgraded, and they are used to eating bad things, so suddenly they don't like good things." "The Glorious Era, directed by Lv Zhuofeng and starring Wang Chao and Chi Xue, is definitely the best movie, best screenwriter, best actor, best photography, and best editing in 2021!"

"So, whether you have seen it or not, you must patiently read my five exclusive viewing strategies below, which will definitely enhance your viewing experience and effectively assist your understanding of the film."

"."

This is a film critic active on Douban. His ID is Xiang Yusheng. His personal profile is: Wild film critic? Screenwriter? Writer? Follow Xiang Yusheng and you won’t waste your money on watching movies. Business: Hxxxxxxx2 (note purpose of visit).

As soon as he posted the article, it quickly attracted a large number of people.

Most people dislike him and oppose him.

"Except for "The Flow of Water", which is a joke in the true sense, the other three points are all bullshit... "We Are the One" scored 8.6 points and it is called a word-of-mouth collapse? Some people don't like to watch it, and it is normal to have negative voices. How come it is a word-of-mouth collapse in your mouth? You can't cheat traffic like this. "The Glorious Era" is not good, so you don't need to drag "We Are the One" into it to save its reputation."

"You are just the Shanzhu. Why is "Glorious Era" the best film, best screenwriter, best actor, best photography, and best editing in 2021? "Glorious Era" and "We Are on the Front Line" are not qualified to be compared at all! One is a delicate package with chocolate inside, and the other is a piece of chocolate that was randomly seasoned and finally tasted like shit."

"Who do you think you are? Only things that are popular among the people are good things. Do you think you are a high-class person?"

"The plot is shit, the editing is shit, the music is shit, even the dialogue is shit!"

"Wild boars can't eat fine bran. But I'm a human being. I eat rice and you eat fine bran. No matter how fine the bran is, it's still bran. There's no conflict."

"(⊙o⊙) Wow, awesome! The high ratings for "Jack the Enforcer" are inflated because of the poor audiences. Some people gave "Glorious Era" low stars, but the ratings are low because of the poor audiences. Your logic is unbeatable!"

"It's so urgent to run a self-media without popularity. Black traffic is also traffic."

"Yes, giving 'Glorious Era' a one-star rating is still too high."

"Who do you think you are? You even think you can educate the audience. If I read a few books and research the background of the story before watching a movie, then why would I go to the cinema? A movie director's job is to tell the story clearly within the length of the movie. If he can't tell the story clearly, and he still asks the audience to read the prototype of the character and the original book, then it's the director's dereliction of duty!"

"That's right, there's nothing wrong with you filmmakers. It's just us stinking country bumpkins who can't understand your highbrow culture!"

“Don’t think that ordinary people don’t know what’s good!”

"If up thinks that The Glorious Era is awesome, then they could have told us what's so awesome about it from the screenwriter's perspective, instead of just showing how awesome the screenwriter, director, actors, and investors are. Do these prove that the movie is awesome? What kind of logic is that!"

But there are also users who stand on the side of the poster.

"You are SD. It's already very clear. Should I start teaching you from the kindergarten? Do you think that because you are SD, the university course should also start from the kindergarten???"

"That's right. The domestic and international film markets are starting to go downhill. 'Glorious Era' is the only movie that has impressed me in such a long time. Most of them are mediocre. I can only say that Lu Zhuofeng is worthy of being Lu Zhuofeng."

"'Glorious Times' is one of the few films in China that depicts the chaos of the liberalization movement. It can only be said that the age of Douban users is relatively young, and many children don't understand it."

"As the population increases, there will be more low-level people. This is normal."

“It’s true that the audience is not good enough.”

"The problem is that I also think it's good and has depth, but how many people give it a low score without even watching it?"

Soon, the comment section became noisy.

This post quickly went viral and became the most popular post under "Glorious Era". More and more people joined the fight, making the argument even louder than usual.

-

Lu Zhuofeng sat in the spacious office, his face as gloomy as a dark cloud pressing down on his head.

The glaring negative comments were like cold arrows piercing his heart, making him feel angry and annoyed.

"What a bunch of rabble! What do they know!"

My movies are art, real art! Every frame and every shot is art!
Just then, a staff member rushed in and said anxiously:
"Director Lu, please come and take a look. There's something wrong with the growth of All or Nothing."

Lu Zhuofeng:?

(End of this chapter)